← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18718/2015disposed

Shanti Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-12-03Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18718 of 2015 ====================================================== Shanti Kumari, Daughter of Sohan Mahto, Resident of village - Lakhochak, P.O. - Bichhawe, P.S. - Chanan, District - Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Secretary, Ministry of Human Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Munger.

3. The District Education Officer, Munger.

4. The District Superintendent of Education, Munger.

5. The Headmaster, Middle School, Sandhe Block Dharahara, Munger. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vijay Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Alok Kumar, AC to SC 15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 03-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

It is admitted that up to date salary has been paid to the petitioner during the pendency of the writ petition and thus the grievance of the petitioner for which the present writ petition was filed has been redressed. However, by way of supplementary affidavit the petitioner has raised the grievance for payment of salary for the period from 1997 to 2000. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Munger who is required to make an inquiry in respect of factual aspect as to whether the petitioner has actually worked during the period for

Patna High Court CWJC No.18718 of 2015(2) dt.03-12-2018 2/2 which she is claiming salary after valid appointment. If it is found that appointment of the petitioner is valid and she has actually worked for the period in question, i.e. from 1997 to 2000, he shall take appropriate steps for payment of salary to the petitioner at the earliest, preferably within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) mrl./- U