Vikram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44938 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2025 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada ====================================================== Vikram Kumar, S/o Bipin Singh @ Bipin Kumar, R/o Village and P.O- Tungi, P.S.-Hisua, District-Nawada, PIN-805129 ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jayram Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-07-2025 Heard Mr. Jayram Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, learned APP for the State.

2.The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 191 of 2025 instituted for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3) and 352 of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution is that while the informant and his son have gone to harvest the wheat crop, they found that the petitioner along with other 10 persons reached there. It is further alleged that the accused persons started assaulting. Regarding this petitioner, it has been alleged that one Saurav and this petitioner attempted to fire but the fire could not be made.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44938 of 2025(2) dt.16-07-2025 2/2 has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no specific allegation against this petitioner of assaulting the informant or his son. Only allegation against the petitioner is that of attempting to make a fire. He is having no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned counsel for the informant is present and has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail of the petitioner. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the informant that the petitioner and others have assaulted badly since there is no specific allegation against the petitioner.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 191 of 2025, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of C.J.M., Nawada, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T