Raghupati Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56928 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2020 Thana- TARIYANI CHOWK District- Sheohar ====================================================== 1.

RAGHUPATI SINGH Son of Late Ram Narayan Singh Resident of Village - Jagdishpur Kothiya, P.S. - Tariyari, District - Sheohar. 2.

Pitambar Kumar @ Pitambar @ mantu Singh @ mantu Kumar Son of Raghupati Singh Resident of Village - Jagdishpur Kothiya, P.S. - Tariyari, District - Sheohar.

3.

Mani Shekhar @ Pintu Singh @ Pintu Kumar Son of Raghupati Singh Resident of Village - Jagdishpur Kothiya, P.S. - Tariyari, District - Sheohar. 4.

Suman Kumar Singh @ Suman Kumar Son of Tripurari Singh @ Tripurari Saran Singh Resident of Village - Jagdishpur Kothiya, P.S. - Tariyari, District - Sheohar.

5.

Yudhvijay Singh Son of Late Ramdev Singh Resident of Village - Jagdishpur Kothiya, P.S. - Tariyari, District - Sheohar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Dr. Rajesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 06-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Tariyani P.S. Case no. 234 of 2020 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, Prosecution story relates to abuse and assault to the informant and his family members by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56928 of 2021(2) dt.06-07-2022 2/2 petitioners and other co-accused persons over a minor dispute of banana cutting.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are is innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties. Both parties have received injuries in alleged occurrence. Nature of injury is mentioned as simple injury in the impugned order. The alleged occurrence took place due to trivial dispute. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioners. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Tariyani P.S. Case no. 234 of 2020, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM II, Sheohar subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U