← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45429/2025allowed

Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-10Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45429 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-59 Year-2025 Thana- ITARHI District- Buxar ====================================================== Ram Singh S/o Kishan Lal Resident of Village- Kadar Chauk, Dhanpura, P.S.- Kadar, District- Bandayun, Uttar Pradesh ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Akhilesh Kr Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 334(1), 303(2), 317(2), 109 and 111 of the BNS and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the informant was informed by one Shyam Mohan Yadav that 8-10 miscreants were committing theft in the shop of the informant and on alarm being raised the villagers gathered there, miscreants were surrounded by villagers. It is further alleged that the miscreants managed to escape by firing. One of them was apprehended. The petitioner is the apprehended one. It has been alleged that from the petitioner, jewellery worth Rupees Sixty Thousand and cash of Rs.12,500/- was recovered.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45429 of 2025(3) dt.10-09-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a labourer and the recovery was not made from him rather recovery was from a bag which was lying there. He was apprehend by the villagers in misconception. The petitioner is in custody since 10.04.2025. The petitioner is aged about 60 years.

5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of bail to the petitioner. He submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of six cases.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Itarhi P.S. Case No. 59 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate- 1st, Buxar.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) durgesh/- U T