Ravi Kumar Singh @ Ravi Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41964 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -84 Year- 2018 Thana -TEKARI District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Ravi Kumar Singh @ Ravi Kumar S/o Madan Singh, R/o Vill.- Guljarbag, P.S.- Tekari and District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Kumar No-2 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Tekari P.S. Case No. 84/2018, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there was dispute between the parties for flow of water, which is apparent from the written report itself.

The petitioner along with others is alleged to have assaulted the informant, his wife and his daughter. The injury report of the three is available with the case diary, which has been received. The doctor has found none of the injury on any vital part of the body of the informant and his family members. From the injury report, it appears that opinion with regard to injury of the wife of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41964 of 2018 (4) dt.02-08-2018 2/2 informant is kept reserved.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Tekari P.S. Case No. 84/2018, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate VI, Gaya, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T