Ghanshyam Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46847 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2023 Thana- JHAJHA District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Ghanshyam Yadav, aged about 47 years, Male, Son of Vacho Yadav Resident of Village-Govindpur, Police Station-Jhajha, District-Jamui 2.

Pinki Sharma @ Pinki Devi, aged about 41 years, Female, Wife of Naresh Sharma Resident of Village-Govindpur, Police Station-Jhajha, District-Jamui 3.

Naresh Sharma, aged about 44 years, Male, Son of Ganesh Sharma Resident of Village-Govindpur, Police Station-Jhajha, District-Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehends their arrest in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 82 of 2023 dated 09.02.2023 instituted under Sections 448, 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 354 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the allegation against the petitioners is that they came armed with lathi, danda, rod etc. and started abusing the informant. Petitioner no. 1 inflicted iron rod over the head of the informant, petitioner no. 2 snatched her ornament and petitioner no. 3 assaulted with lathi

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46847 of 2023(2) dt.19-08-2023 2/2 over her temporal region.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to family dispute, the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The petitioner no. 3 and husband of the informant are own brother and there is land dispute between them. The injury on informant is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in Jhajha P.S. Case No. 82 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) P. Kumar U T