Chandan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48839 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2023 Thana- DARAUNDA District- Siwan ====================================================== Chandan Singh Son of Shri Ram Singh Resident of village - Dibbi, Police Station - M.H. Nagar, District - Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 07-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Daraunda (M.H. Nagar) P.S. Case No.218 of 2023, registered for the offence punishable u/s 386, 387, 307, 120(B), 504, 506/34 of the IPC and section 27 of the Arms Act.

3.

Allegedly, the petitioner is said to have previously threatened one Bachcha Singh (employer of the informant) on his Whatsapp and demanded extortion money. As per the prosecution case, on the alleged date of occurrence, four unknown miscreants fired with pistol on the informant. 4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence. He is not named in the F.I.R. and has been falsely implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48839 of 2024(2) dt.07-08-2024 2/2 this case due to ulterior motive. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious physical possession of the petitioner. There is no specific overt act against the petitioner. Petitioner has thirteen criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 01.05.2024.

5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that petitioner has several criminal antecedent in similar nature of offence.

6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of bail on his behalf is hereby rejected.

7.

This application is accordingly dismissed.

8.

However, petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T