Gautam Sahani And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18927 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -133 Year- 2016 Thana -PARSA District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Gautam Sahani
2. Govind Sahani
3. Ramratan Sahani @ Ramjatan Sahani All sons of Mosaheb Sahani
4. Mosaheb Sahani, son of Late Deepa Sahni
5. Lagni Devi, W/o Mosaheb Sahani
6. Darshaniya Devi, W/o Rajan Sahani
7. Chunmun Devi, W/o Govinda Sahani
8. Maula Devi, W/o Ranjatan Sahani All resident of village- Latrahiyan. P.S. Parsa, District- Saran .... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Pawan Kumar Chaurasiya (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 28-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel representing the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 133 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 498(A), 201, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1, 2 & 3 are Dewars, petitioner no.4 was father-inlaw has already been arrested, petitioner no.5 is mother-in-law, petitioner no.6 is Aunt-in-law (Mausi) and petitioner nos. 7 & 8 are gotnis of the deceased, the husband is in custody, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. The
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18927 of 2017 (3) dt.28-06-2017 2/2 petitioners are residing separately since long. During investigation also it has come that the petitioners are separate however, the matter has been compromised and the informant after realizing the truth has filed compromise petition as his daughter died due to burn injury which received at the time of cooking accidentally. Certified copy of compromise has been filed today which is kept on record and, as such, the petitioners deserve sympathetic consideration.
The learned A.P.P. submits that now the informant is retracting from his earlier version.
In the facts and circumstances as stated above, the petitioner nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 & 8 in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-XIII, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Parsa P.S. Case No. 133 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down in section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T