Sanjeet Yadav @ Sanjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50792 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2024 Thana- DARBHANGA SADAR DistrictDarbhanga ====================================================== 1 .

SANJEET YADAV @ SANJEET KUMAR SON OF BIRO YADAV @ BORO YADAV R/O- VILLAGE- MANIYARI, P.S.- MABBI O.P., DISTT.- DARBHANGA 2.

BIRO YADAV @ BORO YADAV SON OF LATE KHUSHI LAL YADAV @ KURSI LAL YADAV R/O- VILLAGE- MANIYARI, P.S.- MABBI O.P., DISTT.- DARBHANGA 3 .

BIHARI YADAV SON OF RAM BHAROSH YADAV R/O- VILLAGEMANIYARI, P.S.- MABBI O.P., DISTT.- DARBHANGA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Virendra Kumar , Advocate Mr. Saket Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP For the State :

Mr.Girish Chandra Jha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-01-2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with regard to petitioner No. 1 .

2. Permission is granted.

3 . The anticipatory bail application with regard to petitioner No. 1 is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn .

4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 and the State.

5 . Petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 apprehend arrest in a case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50792 of 2024(4) dt.09-01-2025 2/3 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341 , 342, 323 , 354 B, 379, 504 and 34 of Indian Penal Code .

6. As per prosecution case , on the alleged date and time of occurrence , all the accused persons including these petitioners came to the house of informant and assaulted informant and others due to which they sustained injury .

7. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that as per F.I.R., specific accusation of assault is against co-accused Sanjeet Yadav. So far as, these petitioners are concerned, there is no allegation of any overt act against them. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

8 . Learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application .

9. Considering the fact that there is no allegation of any overt act against these petitioners , clean antecedent of these petitioners and other circumstances this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner Nos. 2 and 3 in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Darbhanga in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50792 of 2024(4) dt.09-01-2025 3/3 connection with Darbhanga Sadar ( Mabbi OP) P. S. Case No. 107 of 2024 , subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T