Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31517/2017bail granted

Vivek Kumar Rai v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-07-13Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31517 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -476 Year- 2016 Thana -ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictSASARAM (ROHTAS) ======================================================

1. Vivek Kumar Rai So of Sri Ram Chandra Rai, Resident of VillageKharahana, P.S.- Dhansoi, P.O.- Kakariya, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Rekha Devi , W/o Vivek Rai, D/o Sri Shio Kumar Rai, Resident of Village- Pipra, P.S.- Karahgar, District- Rohtas. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Shree Kant Pandey, Adv. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Atul Chandra, APP 12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under Sections 498A, 323 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner is husband of opposite party no. 2. There is allegation of demand of dowry and torture for the same. In paragraph 11 of the petition it has been stated that the petitioner is ready for amicable settlement of dispute and restoration of conjugal life.

Opposite party no. 2 appears and submits that she is also ready for restoration of conjugal life.

In the circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31517 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 476 of 2016 to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sararam, or successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. If both the spouses go together, the Court below shall confirm the provisional anticipatory bail otherwise pass necessary order according to law.

(Birendra Kumar, J) SA/- U √ T √