Babloo Tuddu And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.31417 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2014 Thana -KHARAGPUR District- MUNGER ======================================================
1. Babloo Tuddu son of Raman Tuddu
2. Bimal Tuddu son of Kailu Tuddu
3. Lalita Devi wife of Bimal Tuddu
4. Mukesh Tuddu son of Sri Prasad Tuddu, All resident of village - Kandani, P.S. Kharagpur, District - Munger
5. Shukar Kol son of Nago Kol Resident of Village - Ualhi, P.S. Belhar, District - Banka .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.38377 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2014 Thana -KHARAGPUR District- MUNGER ======================================================
1. Manoj Soren Son of Pairu Soren
2. Pairu Soren Son of Mari Soren Both resident of Village - Kandni, P.S. - Kharagpur, District - Munger.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.39403 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2014 Thana -KHARAGPUR District- MUNGER ====================================================== Arbind Tuddu son of Jag Lal Tuddu, resident of village Kandani, P.S. Kharagpur, District Munger .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.41547 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -22 Year- 2014 Thana -KHARAGPUR District- MUNGER ======================================================
1. Birendra Kumar @ Birendra Tuddu @ Tuddu Son of Babulal Tuddu R/o Village Kandni, P.S. Kharajpur, District Munger
2/4 .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
(In Cr.Misc. No.31417 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar, APP (In Cr.Misc. No.38377 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jyoti Ranjan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nand Kumar, APP (In Cr.Misc. No.39403 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar, APP (In Cr.Misc. No.41547 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jyoti Ranjan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.B.S. Pahepuri, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 09-01-2015 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 341, 342, 353, 121(A), 124, 122 of the Indian Penal Code as well as 25(1-A), 25(1-AA), 25(1-AAA), 26(1) 26(2), 35, 27 of the Arms Act and 16, 17, 18, 20, 23 of the U.A.P. Act.
Considering that the Petitioners are in custody since 6.2.2014 and have fair antecedents, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar,
3/4 Munger in connection with Kharagpur P.S. Case No.22 of 2014, subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners.
The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioners, (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the petitioners are not an accused in any other case and if they are they shall not be released on bail, (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the petitioners are implicated in any other case of similar nature after their release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on ground of misuse, (iv) That the petitioners will give an undertaking that they will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if they fail to do so on two given dates and delay the trial in any manner, their bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (v) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail will be liable to be cancelled.
In the nature of allegations, the petitioners are directed to appear before the Officer Incharge of their respective Police
4/4 Stations within fifteen days of his release with a copy of this order and every two weeks thereafter for the next nine months. The conduct of the petitioners will be kept under watch in this period by the Officer Incharge concerned and if it is found wanting in any respect, a report shall be made to the court concerned by him to initiate a proceeding for cancellation of bail for reasons of misuse of bail. After reporting to the Officer Incharge concerned, a certificate will be filed by the petitioner before the court concerned.
(Anjana Prakash, J) Narendra/- U T