Ravi Shankar Singh @ Ravi Shankar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.922 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-810 Year-2019 Thana- BHAGALPUR KOTWALI DistrictBhagalpur ====================================================== RAVI SHANKAR SINGH @ RAVI SHANKAR S/o Panna Lal Singh Permanent Resident of Village- Ratan, P.S.- Gogri Jamalpur, Distt- Khagaria, At Present Resident of Mohalla- Mashakchak, Near Anand Clinic, P.S.- Sabour, Distt- Bhagalpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shivpujan Sahay, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Bilash Roy Raman, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 17-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Kotwali (Barari) P.S. Case No. 810 of 2019 registered under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 385, 452 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code.
Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is general and omnibus allegation against him.
Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the prayer of the petitioner by contending that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.922 of 2021(5) dt.17-01-2022 2/2 petitioner is the brother-in-law of the informant. On perusal of the first information report, it appears that petitioner threatened and assaulted the informant by the back side of his pistol. Due to fear, informant rushed towards window and raised noise and in the meantime, petitioner pushed him from his leg and threw out him from the window and due to which, leg of the informant fractured. Injury report also corroborates the same. Hence, petitioner does not deserve to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. Having considered the above facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions advanced on behalf of the State, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, prayer of the petitioner is rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Trial Court and seek Regular Bail, which shall be considered without being prejudiced by this order on merit. utkarsh/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T