Munchun Mahto @ Manchun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45981 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2022 Thana- TEGHRHA District- Begusarai ====================================================== 1.

Munchun Mahto @ Manchun Kumar Son Of Late Bhola Mahto R/VHariharpur, Ward No. 1, P.S- Teghra, Dist- Begusarai 2.

Tara Devi Wife Of Late Bhola Mahto R/V- Hariharpur, Ward No. 1, P.STeghra, Dist- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Yogesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 13-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Teghra P.S. Case no. 113 of 2022 instituted for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 354, 354B, 379, 386, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Prosecution story is that the the accused persons including the petitioner no.1 tried to outrage the modesty of informant at the instance of petitioner no.2 namely, Tara Devi. It is further alleged that they used to make demand ransom money from the informant and her husband.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45981 of 2022(2) dt.13-12-2022 2/2 has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. It is further submitted that the informant's husband is a PDS dealer and he used to give less quantity of food grains, the petitioners objected for the same due to which they have falsely been made accused in this case. The allegation of outrage the modesty is against the petitioner is false and fabricated. It is further submitted that ransom money has not been executed. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Teghra P.S. Case no. 113 of 2022, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M. Begusarai subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) amandeep/- U T