Indra Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.600 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-520 Year-2008 Thana- BHAGALPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Indra Devi Wife of Chotu Ravidas, Resident of Baluachak Jamgaon, Police Station- Jagdishpur, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

Prakash Ravidas, Son of Shankar Ravidas 3.

Dinesh Ravidas, Son of Sundra Ravidas.

4.

Rajendra Ravidas, Son of Late Sakhichand Ravidas 5.

Mahesh Ravidas, Son of Late Badeo Ravidas.

6.

Mahtar Ravidas, Son of Late Paro Ravidas.

7.

Kanhaiya Ravidas, Son of Late Budhu Ravidas.

8.

Jhunna Ravidas, Son of Bisun Ravidas.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 02-08-2022 The petitioner in the present case is aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment dated 24.03.2018 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Bhagalpur in Cr. Appeal No. 15 of 2015 whereby and whereunder the learned Additional Sessions Judge has refused to interfere with the judgment of the learned trial court.

On perusal of the impugned judgment, it appears that the learned court below has rejected the contention of the complainant-appellant that the accused persons-respondents were liable to be convicted under Sections 147 and 353 of the

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.600 of 2018(4) dt.02-08-2022 2/2 IPC. The appellate court has found that no charge was framed under Sections 147 and 354 of the IPC and this was never agitated by the complainant-appellant in accordance with the provision of 216(1) Cr.P.C. at any stage of the trial. Learned appellate court has taken a correct view of the matter on the basis of the materials available on the record, hence, this Court finds no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment.

The revision application is dismissed accordingly. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) SUSHMA2/- U Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.