Rajeev Ranjan @ Rajeev Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL REVISION No.591 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-1111 Thana- District- ====================================================== Rajeev Ranjan @ Rajeev Kumar, son of Sri Awadh Kishore Singh, Resident of Village Mohammadpur, P.O. P.S.- Hisua, District Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar 2.
Dolly Kumari, D/o Sri Shailendra Prasad Singh, W/o Rajeev Ranjan, Resident of Village- Mohammadpur, P.O. P.S.- Hisua District Nawada, At present residing at Lakhanpatti, P.O. P.S.- Begusarai, District- Begusarai. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Surendra Kishore Thakur, Adv.
Mr. Brajesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the State :
Mr. Akhileshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 02-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner in the present case is aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment dated 08.03.2018 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Begusarai in Maintenance Case No.96(M)/2016 whereby and whereunder the learned Principal Judge has allowed a maintenance allowance of Rs.8,000/- per month to the opposite party no.2. Having regard to the uncontroverted materials that the petitioner is a teacher and his salary is about Rs.32,000/- per month at the relevant time, learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Begusarai has allowed a maintenance allowance of
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.591 of 2018(4) dt.02-08-2022 2/2 Rs.8,000/- per month to the opposite party no.2. Although a plea has been taken in this revision application that the opposite party no.2 is an educated lady and capable of earning but it is not the case of the petitioner that the applicant-wife has got any independent income.
This Court finds no illegality or infirmity in the impugned judgment.
This application has no merit. It is dismissed accordingly.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.