Manoj Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1021 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2020 Thana- BELAGANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== MANOJ YADAV ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shailesh Kumar, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Asha Kumari, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-04-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual court proceeding. Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceeding. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 162 of 2020 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 385, 387 of the Indian Penal Code. As per the prosecution case, the informant claimed that he is a Manager of Warish Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. and was constructing road on Bela-Tekari route. On 04.06.2020 at about 11:16 AM, 01:19 PM, 05:23 PM, 06:59 PM and on 07:50 PM, he received
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1021 of 2021(3) dt.08-04-2021 2/2 threatening calls from mobile No. 7050106246 and 8229886790 and the caller demanded ransom from him and threatened that if he fails to fulfill his demand then the machine would put on fire. The caller further claimed that he is a member of T.P.C. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He is quite innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner has several criminal antecedents as mentioned in para 3 of the bail application and has been languishing in custody since 08.06.2020.
Considering the nature of allegation as well as criminal antecedent of the petitioner I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected in connection with Belaganj P.S. Case No. 162 of 2020. Accordingly, the application is dismissed.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) GAURAV S./- U T