Sanjeet Kumar @ Sanjeet Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46539 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-530 Year-2021 Thana- JAHANABAD District- Jehanabad ====================================================== SANJEET KUMAR @ SANJEET PASWAN Son of Late Hari Mohan Paswan Resident of Village - Razabazar, South Daulatpur, P.S.- Jehanabad, District - Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 448, 341, 323, 324, 307, 380, 504, 337, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The informant alleges that the accused persons including the petitioner came and petitioner assaulted him by an iron rod causing injury on head, Shailendra assaulted Chandan with khanti causing injury on head, thereafter, accused persons also assaulted his family member Ranvijay and Manoj snatched gold locket, it is next alleged that petitioner also snatched gold locket of Chandan and also took out Rs. 75,000/- from the house.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46539 of 2022(2) dt.06-12-2022 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the present case, it is next submitted that allegation of snatching and taking out money is ornamental in nature, it is further submitted that on account of dispute earlier the present occurrence took place in which even people from the side of the petitioner were also injured and there is a counter case.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner and submits that there is a direct allegation against this petitioner of assaulting the informant by iron rod causing injury on head, it is further submitted that from perusal of Annexure -3 at page 19 it would manifest that the informant had two lacerated wounds on the head which amply demonstrates that he was assaulted as alleged and the injury has been found to be grievous. Considering the submission made by the learned A.P.P., the Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail application to the petitioner. (Satyavrat Verma, J) GauravSinha/- U T