Navin Kumar @ Deepak Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.45623 of 2018 ======================================================
1. Navin Kumar @ Deepak Kumar, Son of Ram Paras Thakur, R/vKhairwa, P.S.- Sitamarhi, Dist.- Sitamarhi. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Ashok Kumar, Son of Late Ramnath Prasad, at present as Branch Manager, Sirsiya, Uttar Bihar Gramin Bank, Sitamarhi. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Singh -5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-08-2018 Heard the parties.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bela P.S.Case nO.218 of 2017 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is that the Branch Manager has got transferred money in his account in conspiracy with him. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the Branch Manager is responsible for that, moreover, he has returned Rs.11 lac.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45623 of 2018 (4) dt.14-08-2018 2/2 period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Sadar Sitamarhi in connection with Bela P.S.Case No.218 of 2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the investigation of the case and make himself available as and when required by the Police, otherwise, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond. With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T