Patna High Court/4024/2021bail granted

Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2021-01-19Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4024 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2020 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Gaya ====================================================== Ajay Kumar, S/O Sri Sanjay Kumar, R/V- Ebrahimpur, P.S. - Sakurabad, Distt. - Jehanabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vijay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. M.K. Nirala, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 19-01-2021 Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.K. Nirala, APP for the State. In the present case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Excise Case No. 93 of 2020 registered for offences punishable under Section 30 (a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2018.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the petitioner had filed a Cr. Misc. No. 19186 of 2020 for grant of bail, which was rejected by this Court vide order dated 11.06.2020 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months of his judicial custody and now the petitioner has completed more than six months of his judicial custody as he is in judicial custody since 15.02.2020.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4024 of 2021(2) dt.19-01-2021 2/2 Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Excise Case No. 93 of 2020 with a condition that one of the bailor will be the close relative of the petitioner and further condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for the purposes of investigation and interrogation, he will remain present for the investigation. In the event of being absent on two consecutive dates without reasonable explanation, the present order will be treated to have been cancelled. (Shivaji Pandey, J) V.K.Pandey/- U T