Ravi Shankar Pandey @ Ravi Prakash Pandey And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.26104 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -20 Year- 2017 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- BHOJPUR ======================================================
1. Ravi Shankar Pandey @ Ravi Prakash Pandey,
2. Shashi Prakash Pandey, Both are sons of Sri Awadhesh Kumar Pandey,
3. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, son of Late Bechu Pandey,
4. Phool Badan Devi @ Phool Badan Pandey, wife of Sri Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, All are residents of Village- Karhasi, Police StationBuxar Muffasil, District- Buxar. .... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Smt. Sandhya Devi, wife of Jyotish Prakash Pandey @ Raju Pandey and daughter of Sheo Murat Ojha, All are residents of Village- Karhasi, Police Station- Buxar Muffasil, in the District- Buxar. presently residing in village- Doghra, Police Station- Bihiya, in the district of Bhojpur. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimal Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Virendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 20 of 2017, registered under Sections 341, 323, 379 and 498(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
The accusation is of torturing of the informant by her husband and other in-laws due to non-fulfillment of demand of cash of Rs. Three Lakhs as dowry and removing her from matrimonial house snatching her personal belongings.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26104 of 2017 (3) dt.08-09-2017 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, in fact, the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 are brother-in-laws, whereas petitioner Nos. 3 and 4 are father-in-law and mother-in-law and they have falsely been implicated in this case only to give undue pressure. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M., Ara Bhojpur in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 20 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T