Guddu Kumar @ Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47676 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-967 Year-2021 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna ====================================================== GUDDU KUMAR @ MUKHIYA SON OF SHRI SURENDRA KUMAR R/O VILLAGE- GULAMALICHAK, P.O.- ANANDPUR CAMP, P.S.- BIHTA, DISTRICT- PATNA ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Phulen Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 09-12-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through video conferencing. This is an application for regular bail on behalf of the petitioner for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 324, 326, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Bihta P.S.Case No. 967 of 2021. As per allegation, co-accused Sumit Kumar caught hold of the husband of the informant and the present petitioner inflicted knife blows on his person. The husband of the informant became seriously injured.
The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is a person of clean antecedent. The injuries are simple in nature and the petitioner is in custody since 21.12.2021.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47676 of 2022(2) dt.09-12-2022 2/2 Considering the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above-named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ADJ-VI, Danapur in connection with Bihta P.S.Case No. 967 of 2021, subject to the following conditions:-
1. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make available as and when required by the court.
2. If the petitioner is found involved in future in the similar type of offence, the prosecution will have liberty to file an application before the court below for cancellation of the bail of the petitioners and the learned court below will take decision in accordance with law.
Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time as provided hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) HR/- U T