← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57011/2021bail granted

Sanjit Chaudhary @ Fekana v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-06Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57011 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-154 Year-2021 Thana- RAJAPAKAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

SANJIT CHAUDHARY @ FEKANA Son of Late Jagdish Chaudhary Resident of Village- Fulhara, P.S.- Rajapakar, Dist- Vaishali. 2.

Arbind Chaudhary Son of Late Jagdish Chaudhary Resident of VillageFulhara, P.S.- Rajapakar, Dist- Vaishali. 3.

Most. Kalva Devi Wife of Late Jagdish Chaudhary Resident of VillageFulhara, P.S.- Rajapakar, Dist- Vaishali. 4.

Ranju Devi Wife of Bimal Chaudhary Resident of Village- Fulhara, P.S.- Rajapakar, Dist- Vaishali.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sabal Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ganesh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 06-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 328 and 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It is a case of dowry death due to non-fulfilment of dowry demand, the deceased was died by the accused persons along with the petitioners.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57011 of 2021(2) dt.06-07-2022 2/2 further submits that the petitioners are in-laws of the deceased and they are separately from the mess and business of the deceased and her husband, namely, Bipin Chaudhary and the ample responsibility is fixed upon the husband of the deceased who is in judicial custody. Petitioners have got clean antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Rajapakar P.S. Case No. 154 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U