Jitendra Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.37533 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2017 Thana- CHAKAI District- Jamui ====================================================== Jitendra Kumar Yadav S/o- Basudeo Yadav, resident of Village- Nimia, Police Station- Sono, District- Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Amrendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Satyendra Narayan Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Chakai P.S. case no. 106 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 406, 409 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is submitted that petitioner has clean antecedents. Petitioner is bonafide employee of the aforesaid company as a Technician. It is further submitted that during investigation it has come that only one battery was missing and theft was committed by other local person which is mentioned in para 7 of the case diary. Petitioner has been named only on suspicion. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37533 of 2018(3) dt.02-08-2018 2/2 weeks from today in connection with Chakai P.S. case no. 106 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the ACJM 3rd Jamui, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions:(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and
(3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T