Patna High CourtMJC/5373/2012disposed

Sudhi Priya v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-01-19Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 5373 of 2012 ====================================================== Sudhi Priya D/o Sri Badshah Mahto Head Mistress Primary School, Sanyasi Tola, Sahit, Vidyapati Nagar, District Samastipur, resident of Sherpur Colony, Police Station Sadar, District Muzaffarpur, presently residing at Hela Bazar, Town P.S. Hajipur, District Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Director, Primary Education, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, the Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Maharaj For the Opp. Party/s : AC to SC-20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 6.

19-01-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.C. to Standing Counsel - 20.

The present petition has been filed with a prayer to initiate contempt proceeding against opposite parties on an allegation of wilful disobedience to an order dated 13-07-2012 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 11668 of 2012. By the said order, the respondent no. 2 was directed to dispose off the matter by a reasoned order.

In this case, ofcourse delay has occurred, but by a reasoned order, the Director, Primary Education has disposed of the representation filed by the petitioner. The said order has been brought on record as Annexure 'B' to the show cause filed on

Patna High Court MJC No.5373 of 2012 (6) dt.19-01-2015 2/2 behalf of opposite party no. 2/Director, Primary Education on 22nd December, 2014 i.e. an order contained in Memo No. 1804 dated 01-12-2014.

Since, in compliance with the order of the writ court, a reasoned order has already been passed, the Court is of the opinion that this Court may not examine the correctness of the order passed by the Director, Primary Education. If the petitioner feels aggrieved with the order, she would be at liberty to assail the same in appropriate proceeding.

The petition stands disposed of.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay/- U