← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56294/2021bail rejected

Niraj Kumar Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

2022-04-20Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56294 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-465 Year-2020 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka ====================================================== Niraj Kumar Pandey Son Of Late Nityanand Pandey R/O Village- Chapra Under, P.S.- Barahat, District- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mritunjay Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 20-04-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case no. 465 of 2020 instituted for the offence punishable under Section 30(a), 32(2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Prosecution case relates to recovery of 103.875 litres IMFL from the vehicle of the petitioner.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He has got no criminal antecedent. Neither the petitioner was arrested on spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious possession.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56294 of 2021(2) dt.20-04-2022 2/2 Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the alleged vehicle belongs to the petitioner, from where recovery of illegal liquor has been made, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and, as such, his application for bail is rejected.

However, if the petitioner surrenders and prays for regular bail, the same may be considered by the court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order of rejection.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U