Mahendra Mahato v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33240 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2014 Thana -RIGA District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Mahendra Mahato .... .... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party.
====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.33488 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2014 Thana -RIGA District- SITAMARHI ====================================================== Bhikhari Mahto .... .... Petitioner.
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party.
====================================================== Appearance :
(In Cr.Misc. No.33240 of 2014) For the Petitioner : Mr. N.K. Agarwal, Sr. Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Pushpa Sinha 2(App) (In Cr.Misc. No.33488 of 2014) For the Petitioner : Mr. N.K. Agarwal, Sr. Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Parmanand Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-01-2015 Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioners are languishing in custody since 21.05.2014 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 323, 324, 341, 447 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that the petitioner Mahendra Mahto caused injury on the head of the informant with knife when the informant fell down then the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33240 of 2014 (3) dt.23-01-2015 2 / 2 petitioner Bhikhari Mahto assaulted with Iron rod on the head of the informant when the son of the informant came to rescue he was also being assaulted.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that there is no accusation of repeating blow. Though injuries have been found incised whereas the specific accusation against Bhikhari Mahto to have assaulted with Iron rod. There is no injury report of the son of the informant on the record. Though the injury of the informant found to be grievous but the injury of son of the informant has been found to be simple.
Considering the nature of accusation and the period under custody, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Sitamarhi, in connection with Riga P.S. Case No. 58 of 2014.
U.K./- (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) U T