Chandrabhushan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46881 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-91 Year-2025 Thana- NAWANAGAR District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.
Chandrabhushan Singh S/o Late Harihar Singh R/o Village- Kirni, P.S.- Nawanagar, District- Buxar.
2.
Surendra Singh @ Fudar Singh @ Fudur Singh S/o Late Bhabhuti Singh R/o Village- Kirni, P.S.- Nawanagar, District- Buxar. 3.
Baijnath Singh S/o Late Parmeshwar Singh R/o Village- Kirni, P.S.- Nawanagar, District- Buxar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uday Pratap Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-07-2026 Heard Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek pre-arrest bail in connection with Nawanagar P.S. Case No. 91/2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126(2),115(2),117(2),74,109,351,324(4),3(5) of the BNS.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, on 21.10.2025 the petitioners along with other named accused persons came to the house of the informant, abused and assaulted her and when the informant objected, the accused
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46881 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 2/3 persons damaged her vehicle and assaulted her husband, son and nephew, causing injuries to them.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. There is case and counter case between the parties, who are agnates, arising out of the same occurrence. The first information report lodged by the petitioners' side has also been brought on record. He submitted that the petitioners, in self defence, may have caused some injuries to the persons of the informant's. He further submitted that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners and the injuries sustained by the injured persons are simple in nature. On these grounds, the petitioners seek to be released on prearrest bail.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Considering the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, the fact that there is case and counter case arising out of the same occurrence between the agnates and both the parties entered into a free fight, in self-defence the petitioners may have caused some injuries on the person of the informant's. In the aforesaid background, I am of the opinion
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46881 of 2026(2) dt.29-07-2026 3/3 that the petitioners have, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.
7. The petitioners, above named, are directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District Court where the case is pending / Concerned Court in connection with Nawanagar P.S. Case No. 91/2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and if it is found that the petitioners are involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force. (Purnendu Singh, J) Ashishsingh/- U T