Sanjay Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11344 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

Sanjay Paswan, Son of Kailash Paswan, Resident of Chandrahatti, P.S.- Dumra, Distt- Sitamarhi.

2.

Kaliya Devi, W/o Kailash Paswan, Resident of Chandrahatti, P.S.- Dumra, Distt- Sitamarhi.

3.

Kailash Paswan, Son of Not Known, Resident of Chandrahatti, P.S.- Dumra, Distt- Sitamarhi.

4.

Ranvijay Bihari, Son of Kailash Paswan, Resident of Chandrahatti, P.S.- Dumra, Distt- Sitamarhi.

5.

Sangita Devi, W/o Ranvijay Bihari, Resident of Chandrahatti, P.S.- Dumra, Distt- Sitamarhi.

6.

Urmila Devi, D/o Kailash Paswan, Resident of Chandrahatti, P.S.- Dumra, Distt- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Rajni Kumari, W/o Sanjay Paswan, Resident of Chandrahatti, P.S.- Dumra, Distt- Sitamarhi.

Present Address: S/o Narayan Paswan, Ward No.21, Mela Road Bhavdeopur (backside of Dr. Anju Singh, District- Sitamarhi). ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. B. N. Pandey, Advocate Mrs. Shweta Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP For the Opp. Party No.2 : Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-09-2022 Heard Mr. B. N. Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the Opp. Party No.2 and the learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that by invoking inherent jurisdiction of this Court, the petitioners sought quashing of order dated 13.08.2019 whereby the learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11344 of 2021(3) dt.01-09-2022 2/2 Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sadar, Sitamarhi took cognizance for the offence under Sections 498(A), 379, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act against the petitioners in connection with Sitamarhi Mahila P.S. Case No. 07 of 2019, arising out of Complaint Case No. 227 of 2019, however, during the pendency of this application, the charges have been framed and as such he seeks permission to withdraw the present application with liberty to raise all the points before the learned trial court. In view of the submissions made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners, the present application stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to raise all the points before the learned trial Court. (Harish Kumar, J) uday/- U