Rajendra Prasad @ Rajendra Sah And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.26749 of 2017 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-763 Year-2016 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran ======================================================
1. Rajendra Prasad @ Rajendra Sah son of Late Narayan Prasad
2. Urmila Devi wife of Rajendra Prasad
3. Laddu Soni @ Laddu Kumar Soni son of Rajendra Prasad
4. Kundan Soni @ Kundan Prasad Soni son of Rajendra Prasad, all resident of village- Lauriya, P.S.- Lauriya, District- West Champaran, At present villageLalu Nagar, I.T.I. Kargahiya, Ward No. 8, Bettiah, P.S.- Bettiah Muffasil, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. State Of Bihar
2. Richa Devi @ Richas Kumari wife of Mithilesh soni, and daughter of Bharat Prasad Soni, resdient of Mohalla Gandak Colony, Bagaha II, P.S.- Bagaha (Patkhauli) District- West Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. vijay Kumar Singh No. 1 Mr. Sanjay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 05-09-2017 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State. Petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Trial No. 1309 of 2017 arising out of Complaint Case No. C- 763 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3⁄4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioners are father-in-law, mother-in-law, brothers-in-law of the opposite party no. 2. They have been made victim of false implication merely because they are relative of her husband. As a matter of fact, petitioners live separately from the husband of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26749 of 2017(3) dt.05-09-2017 2/2 the opposite party no. 2. Petitioners neither demanded any dowry nor subject her to cruelty. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions of advanced on behalf of the parties, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Trial No. 1309 of 2017 arising out of Complaint Case No. C- 763 of 2016 subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) mcv/- U T