Brajesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56075 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2021 Thana- SHAHKUND District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== BRAJESH KUMAR S/o- Silendra Yadav Resident of Village- Sahabad, P.S.- Sultanganj, District- Bhagalpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pranav Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with Sahkund P.S. Case no. 125 of 2021 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Prosecution case relates to killing of Rupesh Kumar, son of the informant over a dispute regarding sell and purchase of sand. About fifteen days ago, in the alleged business of sand, there was a quarrel between two groups, in which informant's son and his friend Rahul Kumar were given threatening of dire consequences by accused persons, namely, Arbind Yadav and Sakaldeo Yadav. Petitioner is nephew (bhagina) of accused

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56075 of 2021(3) dt.04-07-2022 2/2 Sakaldeo Yadav.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. No one is eye witness of the case. Except suspicion, nothing has came against the petitioner. As petitioner is relative of the main accused, his name has been dragged in the present case.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of bail and submitted that petitioner has criminal antecedent of a case registered under Arms Act. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that petitioner is involved in killing the son of the informant, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner and, as such, his application for bail is rejected. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U