Rahul Kumar Sahni @ Raman Kumar Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47163 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-284 Year-2021 Thana- BAHERI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== RAHUL KUMAR SAHNI @ RAMAN KUMAR SAHNI Son of Shambhu Sahni Resident of village - Makhnaha, P.S.- Baheri, District - Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Nilendu Kumar Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammad Sufyan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-08-2023

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

3. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 284 of 2021 dated 28.12.2021 registered for the offences punishable u/s 302 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. As per the prosecution case, unknown miscreants are alleged to have murdered the son of the informant.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47163 of 2023(2) dt.03-08-2023 2/2 this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner is not named in the FIR. The name of the petitioner has surfaced on the basis of confessional statement of the petitioner. There is nothing material except confessional statement of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 13.01.2022.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and submitted that weapon was recovered at the instance of the petitioner.

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Darbhanga in connection with Baheri P.S. Case No. 284 of 2021.

8. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Alok Verma/- U T