Kunal Kumar @ Bittu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46495 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-586 Year-2022 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada ====================================================== KUNAL KUMAR @ BITTU Son of Anil Prasad Singh @ Anil Kumar Resident of Village - Khanma, P.S.- Narhat, District - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Deepak Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Madhura Nand Jha, APP.

Mr. Dinkar Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 25-08-2023 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354, 307, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, after some altercation, all the accused persons including the petitioner abused and assaulted the informant and his family members. Petitioner is said to have assaulted the informant with iron rod on his head due to which he sustained injury.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46495 of 2023(2) dt.25-08-2023 2/2 general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that the present case is counter blast of Narhat P.S. Case No. 585 of 2022 lodged earlier to the present case by co-accused Arvind Singh against the informant of the present case, namely, Ranjeet Singh who has been granted anticipatory bail in that case. Both sides have sustained injuries. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, there is case and counter case between the parties, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Narhat P.S. Case No. 586 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T