Raghu Nandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11148 of 2024 ====================================================== Raghu Nandan Yadav Son of Late Pant Lal Yadav, Resident of Village- Jhunni Tola, Police Station-Krityanand Nagar, Post Office-Bianihiya Baluwa, District-Purnea.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Collector, Purnea.

3.

The Additional Sub Divisional Officer (Ceiling) Purnea. 4.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sadar, Purnea. 5.

Circle Officer, Sri Nagar, Purnea.

6.

Mukhiya Gram Panchayat, Block-K. Nagar, Police Station-K.Nagar, District-Purnea.

7.

Khantar Rishi Son of Singeshwar Rishi Resident of Village-Jhunni Tola, Police Station-K.Nagar, District-Purnea 8.

Laltu Rishi Son of Singeshwar Rishi Resident of Village-Jhunni Tola, Police Station-K.Nagar, District-Purnea 9.

Shakunti Devi Wife of Lakshman Rishi Resident of Village-Jhunni Tola, Police Station-K.Nagar, District-Purnea 10.

Dhirendra Riashi Son of Janardan Rishi Resident of Village-Jhunni Tola, Police Station-K.Nagar, District-Purnea 11.

Birendra Rishi Son of Late Jamadar Rishi Resident of Village-Jhunni Tola, Police Station-K.Nagar, District-Purnea 12.

Shanichar Rishi Son of Late Ritu rishi, Resident of Village-Jhunni Tola, Police Station-K.Nagar, District-Purnea ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kumar Manglam, AC to SC-24.

For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Vijay Anand, Advocate. For Intervenor : Mr. Santosh Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Praful Tiwari, Advocate.

Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate.

Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Mishra, Advocate.

Mr. Utsav, Advocate.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 28-04-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned AC to SC-24.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11148 of 2024(4) dt.28-04-2025 2/2

2. The learned Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner after arguing vehemently for some time, realizing his difficulty, seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ application with liberty to avail his remedy in accordance with law before a Court of competent Civil jurisdiction.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U