Geeta Devi And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3589 of 2013 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17155 of 2009 ======================================================
1. Geeta Devi, Wife Of Binod Paswan, Resident of Mohalla- Chitkohra, Behind Purani Bhatti, P.O.- Anishabad, P.S.- Gardanibagh, District- Patna
2. Satya Narain Rai, Son of Late Kannu Rai, Resident of MohallaChakaram, P.O.- General Post Office, P.S.- Budha Colony, District- Patna .... .... Petitioners
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government Of Bihar, Patna, Namely Sri Veyash Jee
2. Sri Surendra Prasad, father name not known, at Present, Director in Chief, Health Services, Government of Bihar, Patna
3. Mahant Singh Ojha, father name not known, at present Regional Deputy Director, Health Services, Patna Division, Patna
4. N.P. Yadav, father name not known to petitioners, at present Civil Surgeon-cum-Medical Officer, Government of Bihar, Patna
5. Amarkant Jha Amar, father name not known, at present the Superintendent, Patna Medical College Hospital, Patna .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Akashdeep, Mr. Shyameshwar Kumar Singh, Advocates For the State : Mr. Sunil Kr. Mandal, S.C. 24, Mr. Arjun Prasad, A.C. to S.C. 24 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 25-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
Learned counsel for the State has submitted that the petitioners have already got the wages till October, 2014. Further payment would be made after necessary allotment having been made.
In my view, a mechanism should be developed by
Patna High Court MJC No.3589 of 2013 (13) dt.25-03-2015 2 / 2 the authority concerned for payment on monthly basis if they are taking work from the petitioners.
In view of the final order having been passed in compliance of the earlier of this Court, this proceeding cannot continue and is, accordingly, dropped. However, if the petitioners are aggrieved by the decision taken and if they claim that calculation done by the authorities are wrong, they, if so advised, would have liberty to assail it before the appropriate forum. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Sanjay-II/- U