Sahzad @ Md. Shajad Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46469 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2022 Thana- JOKIHAT District- Araria ====================================================== SAHZAD @ MD. SHAJAD ALAM Son of Md. Tahir Alam @ Tahir Resident of Village - Padampur, Ward No.13, P.s.- Jokihat (Mahalgaon), Distt.- Araria. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gopal Kumar Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jokihat (Mahalgaon) P.S. Case No.39 of 2022 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 308, 354(A), 379, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The petitoner has been implicated in this case due to enmity. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner by contending that the allegation of causing injury on the head of the informant with iron rod is specific against the petitioner which is corroborated by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46469 of 2022(5) dt.16-02-2023 2/2 injury report. The doctor has found the said injury as grievous in nature. Therefore, the petitioner does not deserve anticipatory bail.

Having considered the above facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegations made against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. Harish/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T