Lalan Pandit v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32034 of 2017 (5) dt.24-08-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.32034 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -33 Year- 2017 Thana -EKMA District- SARAN ====================================================== Lalan Pandit S/o Baij Nath Pandit Resident of village- Chand Kudariain, P.S.- Masrakh, District- Saran .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar - 1, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 24-08-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Ekma Police Station Case No. 33 of 2017, disclosing offences under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 383, 506/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, the petitioner happens to be father-in-law of the co-accused, Vijay Kumar Pandit, who is said to be full brother of informant and the petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. Moreover, the injuries sustained by the prosecution side is simple in nature, which is evident from
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32034 of 2017 (5) dt.24-08-2017 Annexure-3. Hence, the petitioner deserves the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1st, Saran, in connection with Ekma Police Station Case No. 33 of 2017, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) Brajesh/- U T