Abhay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.45 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12512 of 2015 ====================================================== Abhay Kumar Singh, Son of late Bechan Singh, Resident of Village- Rampur Kharkhar, PO- Ekchari, PS- Rasalpur, District Bhagalpur,t he Chairman of Rampur Kharhara PACS, Kahalgaon, Bhagalpur.

... Petitioner ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd. Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate Bhagalpur.

5. The District Co-operative Officer, Bhagalpur.

6. The District Supply Officer, Bhagalpur.

7. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Kahalgaon, Bhagalpur.

8. The Block Development Officer, Kahalgaon, Bhagalpur.

9. The District Agriculture Officer, Bhagalpur.

10. The Manager, State Food Corporation Ltd. Bhagalpur.

11. The Block Co-operative Extension Officer, Kahalgaon, Bhagalpur.

12. The Block Agriculture Officer, Kahalgaon, Bhagalpur.

13. The Block Co-operative Extension Officer, Pirpainti, Bhagalpur.

14. The Sr. Accounting Officer, Co-operative Society, Bhagalpur.

15. The Registrar, Co-operative Society, Patna.

16. The Joint Registrar, Cooperative Society, Bhagalpur.

17. The Secretary, Department of Food and Consumer, Government of India (Union of India), New Delhi.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rama Kant Sharma, Sr. Adv. withy Mr. Lakshmi Kant Sharma, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mr. Satyadarshi Sanjay, Adv.

For the Opposite Party- BSFC: Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 23-01-2019 In view of the opinion present at paragraphs 17 to 21 of the judgment of the Division Bench in LPA No.881 of 2016 and analogous cases preferred by the Corporation, which includes the review petitioner as well, whereby the Division Bench after modifying the order passed by this Court, has issued

Patna High Court C. REV. No.45 of 2016(4) dt.23-01-2019 2/2 further directions, I am of the opinion that no case of review would arise in so far as the order of this Court is concerned and in case the review petitioner is aggrieved by any part of the order of this Court or the Division Bench, the remedy would be before the Division Bench and not before this Court. No cause for review is thus made out. This Civil Review application is disposed of accordingly. (Jyoti Saran, J) Anjula/Skpathak U