Julekha Khatoon v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32411 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -39 Year- 2016 Thana -SRI NAGAR District- MADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Julekha Khatoon, Wife of Md. Shakeel, Resident of Village- Puraini, Police Station- Sri Nagar, District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kumar Ranjit Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Srinagar P.S. Case No. 39 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections-307, 302 & other minor sections of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is a lady. She has no criminal antecedent. There is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner in the written report.

It appears that the petitioner is named in the written report but there is no specific allegation of overt act against the petitioner.

Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed it is ordered that the petitioner named above, in the event

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32411 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 of her arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Srinagar P.S. Case No. 39 of 2016 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Madhepura subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,

(2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T