Lalita Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.39710 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -25 Year- 2018 Thana -BHARGAWAN District- ARRARIA ======================================================
1. Lalita Devi W/o Manoj Mehta, R/o Vill.- Tonha Ward No.02, P.S.- Bhargama, District- Araria.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anant Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 07-08-2018 The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 25/2018, G.R. No.357/2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b) a/26 of the Arms Act.
Allegation as per F.I.R. is that police had unearthed arms factory and the husband of the petitioner was arrested and it is alleged that petitioner was also assisting her husband. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that she has falsely been implicated in this case only because she happens to be the wife of co-accused of this case. It has further been submitted that she has no criminal antecedent. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39710 of 2018 (3) dt.07-08-2018 2/2 event of her arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Araria, in connection with Bhargama P.S. Case No. 25/2018, G.R. No.357/2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make herself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on her part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of her bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T