Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45185 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-295 Year-2024 Thana- PATAHI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Arvind Kumar @ Arvind Kumar Thakur S/o Ram Janam Thakur R/o VillPansalva, P.S.- Patahi, Distt- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sangeet Deokuliar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Rabindra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2025 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Sangeet Deokuliar and learned A.P.P. for the State, Sri Rabindra Kumar. 2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 223, 326(g), 324(4), 191(2), 191(3) and 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 21-11-2024 at 7:30 am, a Scorpio vehicle dashed a minor boy aged about 10 years, who died on the spot, further some antisocial elements of the village including the petitioner along with 3 named accused and 10-15 unknown accused burnt the vehicle instead of informing the police.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45185 of 2025(4) dt.15-11-2025 2/2 informant, who is Chowkidar of the village. It is next submitted that even allegation of burning the vehicle is not specific. It is further submitted that on account of accident, a minor boy aged about 10 years of the village died, as such the villagers became enraged and committed the occurrence. It is also submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation to prove his innocence. It is reiterated and submitted that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Patahi P.S. Case No. 295 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Sumit/- U T