Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41459 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -76 Year- 2018 Thana -BIDUPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Sunil Kumar Singh @ Sunil Singh, S/o Kamleshwari Singh,

2. Dipu Kumar S/o Uma Shankar Singh, Both R/o Vill.- Kharika, P.S.- Bidupur, District- Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-08-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 76 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 363 and 365 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is that they have kidnapped the daughter in law of the informant. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that save and except the allegation that the petitioners were seen going with these petitioners, there is nothing against the petitioners and they have been made accused in this case only on the basis of suspicion.

Learned counsel for the State opposed the prayer for bail, however, he could not show any circumstance to show the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41459 of 2018 (3) dt.21-08-2018 2/3 involvement of the petitioners in the alleged offence. Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No. 76 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and shall also cooperate in finding out the victim and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41459 of 2018 (3) dt.21-08-2018 3/3 without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T