← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52309/2025allowed

Shanu Kumar @ Shanu Kr. v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-18Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52309 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-153 Year-2021 Thana- LODIPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Shanu Kumar @ Shanu Kr. Son of Manoj Kumar Tanti, Resident of Mohalla - Laluchak Bhatta, Police Station - Ishakchak, District - Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Sevak Choudhary, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 18-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Lodipur P.S. Case No.153 of 2021 instituted under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of 18.750 liter Indian made foreign liquor from the motorcycle of the petitioner which was driven by the co-accused Mukesh Kumar.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case being the owner of the seized motorcycle. He further submits that the apprehended co-accused Mukesh Kumar has taken the motorcycle of petitioner on the pretext that his father needs immediate medication and has to be taken to doctor for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52309 of 2025(2) dt.18-08-2025 2/2 his treatment. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was not aware of the evil designs of co-accused Mukesh Kumar. He further submits that no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel submits that petitioner has clean criminal antecedent and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge IX, Bhagalpur in connection with Lodipur P.S. Case No.153 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T