Patna High CourtCR. REV./769/2018disposed

Sanyog Lohar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2022-08-31Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL REVISION No.769 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-109 Year-2017 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Sanyog Lohar S/o Babu Lal Lohar, R/o Vill.- Orgaon, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Distt.- Kaimur Bhabua.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar 2.

Manoj Dubey S/o Tengar Dubey, R/o Vill.- Orgaon, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, Distt.- Kaimur Bhabua.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vinod Kumar Seth, Advocate For the State :

Mr.(Dr.) Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 31-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Despite valid service of notice on opposite party no.2, he has not entered appearance.

Petitioner in this case is aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the order dated 18.05.2018 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Kaimur at Bhabua in Cr.Revision No.239 of 2017 whereby and whereunder the learned Sessions Judge has been pleased to set aside the order dated 05.12.2017 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-V at Bhabua in connection with Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No.109 of 2017. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and daughter of opposite party no.2 are living as

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.769 of 2018(4) dt.31-08-2022 2/2 husband and wife and they have been blessed with a child. It is, thus, submitted that the order of the learned Sessions Judge has not been implemented. In terms of the order of the learned Sessions Judge, the learned Magistrate has not passed any other or further order. With the efflux of time even as per her educational certificate the daughter of the informant has attained majority and she can take her own decision.

Since there is no opposition to this application and this Court has been informed that the petitioner and daughter of the informant are living together and pursuant to the order of the learned Sessions Judge, Kaimur at Bhabua no further order has been passed by the learned Magistrate, this Court finds no reason to proceed with this revision application. It is disposed of as having become infructuous.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) arvind/- U T Note: The ordersheet duly signed has been attached with the record. However, in view of the present arrangements, during Pandemic period all concerned shall act on the basis of the copy of the order uploaded on the High Court website under the heading 'Judicial Orders Passed During The Pandemic Period'.