← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44243/2025bail granted

Anil Panjiyara v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-06Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44243 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-341 Year-2016 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ====================================================== Anil Panjiyara S/O Late Mahendra Panjiyara Resident of Village- Nagardih, P.S- Fullidumar, Dist Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

The State Of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Praveen Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ram Sevak Choudhary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Amarpur (Fullidumar) P.S. Case No. 341/2016 dated 03.08.2016 registered for the offence punishable u/s 147, 148, 149, 341 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 03.08.2016, the informant's father Punit Lal Panjiyara had gone to the orchard to attend the nature's call at about 6.00 P.M., when the informant heard the sound of firing and went to the place of occurrence, he saw that the petitioner along with co-accused persons was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44243 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 2/3 fleeing away and as he reached near his father, he saw that his father was dead.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The other co-accused person has already been granted bail by the co-ordinate bench of this court vide order dated 14.02.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 44787/2022. The petitioner has four antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 18.03.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Banka in connection with Amarpur (Fullidumar) P.S. Case No. 341/2016, with the condition ;- (i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44243 of 2025(2) dt.06-08-2025 3/3 present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bond of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T