Anoj Thakur v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.916 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-134 Year-2020 Thana- CHAKAI District- Jamui ====================================================== Anoj Thakur, Son of Janaki Thakur, Resident of Village- Dulaiya, Police Station- Chakai, District- Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Amit Kumar Rakesh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-02-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects as pointed out by the office within four weeks of normal functioning of the court, failing which the office is directed to place the matter before the Bench. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
Prosecution case in brief is that as per FIR, on 12.07.2020 all the named accused persons including the petitioner came to the field variously armed and started cutting his crop, on being protested a scuffle took between both the parties. It has been said that Shankar Thakur tried to hit the informant with an iron rod, but it hit the head of Anil Thakur,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.916 of 2021(2) dt.26-02-2021 2/2 besides they hit each other by lathies and rod. It has further been said that the accused persons also snatched the silver chain of Savitri Devi.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties and there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner is languishing in jail custody since 26.09.2020. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent which is mentioned in para 3 of the bail petition. On the perusal of the impugned order the injury is simple in nature. Learned APP for the State has opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No. 134/2020 to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-III rd, Jamui. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) amitkumar/- U T