← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50837/2024bail granted

Baraun Singh @ Barun Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2024-07-29Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50837 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2024 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Baraun Singh @ Barun Kumar Singh, Son of Jawahar Lal Singh @ Jawahar singh Resident of Vill- Malikana, P.S.- Manjhagarh, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Saurabh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 29-07-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the allegation is of recovery of 59.8 litres of liquor from a sack allegedly thrown by the petitioner and other accused persons.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place, which does not belong to the petitioner and he has no concern with the sack from which the alleged

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50837 of 2024(2) dt.29-07-2024 2/3 recovery is said to have been made. It is next submitted that he came to be implicated at the instance of Chaukidar. It is next submitted that police in majority of cases implicating innocent persons either at the behest of Chaukidar or local person and how Chaukidar identified the petitioner, when petitioner is not known to him.

5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.D.J.-XIII-cum-Special Judge Excise-1, Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P. S. Case No.111 of 2024, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

7. The application stands allowed.

8. It is made clear that the learned trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event, if it is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50837 of 2024(2) dt.29-07-2024 3/3 found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case, in that event, the present anticipatory bail application shall not be given effect to.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T