Heera Rai @ Heeralal Rai And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42849 of 2018 ======================================================
1. Heera Rai @ Heeralal Rai, S/o Late Mahaveer Rai,
2. Sunil Kumar Rai @ Bachcha Rai @ Bachcha, S/o Drup Rai, Both R/o Village- Siury, P.S.- Mashrak, District- Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bishwajeet Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ansarul Haque ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Mashrak P.S. Case No. 141 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioners is of kidnapping of the minor daughter of the informant. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that the daughter of the informant had already married with the son of the petitioner No.1, which would appear from Annexure-2, and the petitioner No.2 is uncle of the accused and they have falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42849 of 2018 (3) dt.03-08-2018 2/2 Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioners, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate- VI, Saran at Chapra in connection with Mashrak P.S.Case No. 141 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438
(2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T