← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10708/2023dismiss for nonprosecution

Gyan Prakash Rai v. The Union Of India

2023-08-21Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10708 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.

Gyan Prakash Rai S/o Sri Rajdeo Rai Resident of Deshari Road, Sadapur Mahua, Post and P.S.Mahua, District-Vaishali, Bihar. 2.

Mayank Kumar S/o Sri Ravindra Kumar Das Resident of Vilalge and PostMirhatti, P.S.-Sultanganj, District-Bhagalpur, Bihar. ... ... Petitioners

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Principal Secretary, Ministry of Education. 2.

The Vice Chancellor, Central University of South Bihar, Panchanpur, Gaya. 3.

The Registrar, Central University of South Bihar, Panchanpur, Gaya. 4.

Dean Student Welfare (DSW), Central University of South Bihar, Panchanpur, Gaya.

5.

Dr. Manjit Singh (Resident Warden), Boys Hostel Gargi Sadan, Central University of South Bihar, Panchanpur, Gaya.

6.

Prof. Vipin Kumar Singh (Chief Warden), Boys Hostel Gargi Sadan, Central University of South Bihar, Panchanpur, Gaya.

7.

Krishana Construction Company, Central University of South Bihar, Panchanpur, Gaya.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the Respondent/s :

Ms.Parul Prasad, Advocate Mr.Rahul Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 21-08-2023 No one appears for the petitioners to press this writ application.

2. Learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 to 7 submits that in fact the hostel in question has already been vacated under videography done by the authorities of the institution on 05.06.2023 itself. It is submitted that the belongings of the petitioner has been kept in the clock room of the hostel and they can collect the same after paying the

Patna High Court CWJC No.10708 of 2023(3) dt.21-08-2023 2/2 dues of the hostel.

3. Since no one is appearing for the petitioners, this writ application is dismissed in want of prosecution. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) tusharika/- U