Arvind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.40037 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -53 Year- 2018 Thana -MAKER District- SARAN ======================================================
1. Arvind Kumar son of Late Laxman Singh, resident of Village- Thahara Paschim Tola, P.S. Maker, District- Saran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 02-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Maker P.S. Case No. 53/2018, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 413, 414 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner was not apprehended on the spot. There is no recovery from his possession. Name of the petitioner has been taken by coaccused Manish Kumar, who was apprehended by the police. It is further submitted that the petitioner has clean antecedent. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Maker P.S. Case No. 53/2018, he
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40037 of 2018 (3) dt.02-08-2018 2/2 shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate 12th, Saran, Chapra, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioner and (3) if petitioner tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T