Raghunath Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.45694 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-83 Year-2024 Thana- SIMRI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Raghunath Sahni S/o Sukhdev Sahni R/o Village- Ranchella, Ward No 3, P.S.- Simri, Dist- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Baidyanath Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-09-2025 Heard Mr. Baidhyanath Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Simri P.S. Case No. 83 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 290, 426, 307, 379, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has assaulted with an iron rod to one Ganesh Sahni on a trivial issue.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that a statement has been made in para 3
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.45694 of 2025(3) dt.16-09-2025 2/2 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 22.05.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and submits that from perusal of the injury report, it will transpire that Ganesh Sahni has received three injuries on the head and out of them, one injury is grievous in nature.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail at this stage and, as such, his prayer for bail stands rejected.
7. However, the petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after six months if the trial is not concluded. (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T